Blogger templates

Pages

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

In England Rooney placed on the agenda of Barça

In England say the club is 'ready for fight' with Real Madrid and Chelsea for the hiring of Wayne Rooney in return for 25 million pounds (about 29, 5 million euros). Or to take a toll on Florentino Perez and Jose Mourinho for his interference in the signing of Neymar da Silva and cost the entity Blaugrana 'peak' of 17 million euros?
The 'The Sun' publishes an article, coinciding with the dates on which the new United's manager David Moyes is expected to meet the scorer of the 'Red Devils' to clear his future. 
Alex Ferguson, the Manchester United until the end of the season, had claimed that Rooney was not for sale after the attacker had asked about the possibility of being traded.
Again according to "The Sun", "Sources of the highest levels of Barca claimed to 'SunSport' who are following the situation and that if United want to pass it, they would be prepared to bid for your record".
"PHENOMENAL"
According to these same sources, Rooney would be precisely the kind of attacker who would fit perfectly into the Barca system. "In the Barca defense starts with the front and Rooney works as hard as anyone else" when it comes to pressure rivals insist.
His one-touch play, his mobility, his control and his vision are listed as "phenomenal" and if it enters the market, of course that the club would be willing to try to sign him. "Relate also the arrival of Wayne Rooney the possible departure of David Villa as Tottenham and Arsenal were interested in signing.
Despite all these considerations, it does not seem simple that the club will enter the competition for the recruitment of Rooney given the huge economic effort has been done to recruit Neymar da Silva, the Brazilian star expected.
Moreover, the priorities in Barcelona go through the recruitment of a central defender. Another Brazilian center-back Thiago Silva PSG, is the favorite of Tito Vilanova although PSG requirements make it difficult to hire. 
ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE OPERATION
In any case, it seems clear that the club will try to solve defensive problems first, bearing in mind that the list of midfielders is exceptionally already struggling to retain Thiago Alcantara-and in front, we first have to clear the future of players like David Villa or any of the homegrown.
Another thing is the defensive line. The departure of Eric Abidal and Carles Puyol physical problems or Javier Mascherano have caused many headaches for Vilanova.
Another thing is that it does not miss that Barca ANADIE, besides always be aware of all the movements of the 'mercato', has suffered interference of Florentino Perez and Real Madrid in the negotiations for the procurement of Neymar.
During the presentation of 'Ney' as brand new Barcelona player, the club sports vice president, Josep Maria Bartomeu, said: "Real Madrid and other clubs" had expensive the signing at 17 million euros (the Blaugrana have spent 57 million by its tab). And now, they are the Real Madrid of Florentino and Jose Mourinho's Chelsea who walk behind the hiring of Wayne Rooney

The One-Handed Backhand’s Vanishing Act

With another Wimbledon fast approaching, let’s first settle the issue of extinction by reassuring tennis connoisseurs everywhere that there will always be one-handed backhands — one-handed slicebackhands.
were suddenly a surplus of exotic sightings at theFrench Open this year. Eight of the men in the round of 16 used the single-handed topspin backhand, and four of them reached the quarterfinals before running into the double-fisted reality of Rafael Nadal, Novak Djokovic, David Ferrer and Jo-Wilfried Tsonga.
A week later, switching from clay to grass, all the semifinalists in Halle, Germany, used the one-hander, led by Federer, who went on to win the title.
Wimbledon, where the ball still bounces lower than on other surfaces and where Federer has won the title seven times, should be another display case, particularly with second-rung players like Richard Gasquet, Tommy Haas and Stan Wawrinka — one-handers all — in fine form.
So is all this a case of wringing the hands (and the alarm bell) too soon?
Perhaps, if you consider that 8 of the top 30 men in the rankings use one-handers, including 3 of the top 10: Federer, Gasquet and Wawrinka. Perhaps, if you consider that one of the most promising young talents, the Bulgarian Grigor Dimitrov, 22, uses a one-hander, too.
But absolutely not when you consider that only 3 of the top 50 women use a one-hand backhand: the Italians Roberta Vinci and Francesca Schiavone and the Spaniard Carla Suárez Navarro, none of whom is in the top 10. And absolutely not when you consider what appears to be in the pipeline.
“Out of the current top juniors, we haven’t been able to find a boy or girl that plays the backhand with just one hand,” Isabelle Gemmel, administrator for junior and senior tennis at the International Tennis Federation, said in an e-mail message.
Brad Gilbert, a top American coach, frequently visits the Bollettieri Academy in Florida to work with promising junior players.
“Every once in a while, when you see a one-handed backhand, you stop and go ‘Whoa!”’ Gilbert said. “I could be generous and say it’s 20 to 1, but it’s more like 40 to 1. There are a few hundred kids down there playing and it’s just very few and far between. I think 10 to 15 to 20 years from now, you’ll be shocked to see one.”
Clearly, tennis has come a long way since Billy Carter, brother of former President Jimmy Carter, objected that a two-handed backhand would not leave him “a free hand to hold the beer.”
It has come even further from the 1930s, when the Australian men’s star Viv McGrath was the first top-flight player to use the two-handed backhand. “I doubt if one person in a thousand could learn to make such a stroke more efficiently with two hands than with one,” wrote Wilbert Allison, a top American player at the time.
Although past stars like Gustavo Kuerten and Pete Sampras abandoned the two-hander as juniors, they are now better stories than examples. The leading players who use one hand exclusively today are generally older. In Paris, the average age of the male one-handers in the round of 16 was 29 years and 7 months, compared with 27 years for those without. As for the women, Vinci is 30, and Schiavone turns 33 on Sunday.
The one-handed drive has its advantages: extra reach in an era when the game has accelerated; more chance of a successful shot when off balance; a greater element of surprise when switching to a drop shot; and a capacity — some say — to generate more acute angles. But the reasons for the preeminence of the two-hander are clear. In a game of increasing athleticism, two hands offer a more solid platform for countering big power and spin of the sort Nadal can produce with his whipping forehand or Serena Williams can produce with her serve
“The contact point is a little bit later with a two-hander, so you can hit more open stance,” said Dave Miley, the I.T.F.’s director of development. “With a two-hander, you’re basically hitting a forehand with the other hand, and as a result you have a little more time and more strength.”.The stroke’s popularity has also reflected the thirst for junior success. Two tiny hands are often much more effective than one, and the two-hander is generally considered easier to teach.
“If you’re thinking about an 8-year-old and saying, ‘Oh we’re going to build the next Pete Sampras or the next Roger Federer’ and go with the one-hander, that’s such a pipe dream,” Gilbert said. “You’re trying to get early success, and it’s just easier. It’s so hard physically to hit a ball when you are 8 or 9 years old with one hand when it’s up above your shoulders. As someone who played with one hand my whole life, the biggest difference for young kids is it’s so much easier to return a serve.”
The mystery is why a younger generation raised on a television diet of Federer’s single-handed brilliance apparently doesn’t feel much like emulating it. “Are we going to see a little wave in five or six years of a bunch of kids who idolized Roger and are trying it?” Masur wondered.
But the truly intriguing development is the I.T.F.’s rule change last year, which mandates smaller courts and, above all, lighter, slower, lower-bouncing balls for players 10 and under.
The goal is to make the game more accessible and to encourage greater variety. Mini-tennis courts and lighter balls have been used in Europe for more than a decade and were credited with helping the former Belgian star Henin develop her magnificent one-hander. Could the rule change help reverse the tactical tide?
“I would never tell a kid to switch one way or the other; I think you take what is naturally given to you,” said Patrick McEnroe, head of player development at the U.S. Tennis Association. “I do think, though, that in watching a lot of the kids with the softer balls, etc., that there’s a chance you’ll see more one-handers develop.”
There are promising young exceptions today, however, most of them from the ancestral homes of attacking tennis.
Bradley Mousley and Jay Andrijic, who won the Australian Open junior boys doubles titles this year, both deploy single-handed backhands. So does Alex Rybakov, a 16-year-old American who just won the I.T.F. International Grass Court Championship in Philadelphia. Girls are rarer.
But as McEnroe notes, the dearth of one-handed topspin strokes in the juniors comes as the one-handed slice is increasingly critical to success at the top. Federer has long used his as a rhythm shifter. Nadal, Djokovic and Andy Murray are also fine practitioners of the single-handed slice, with Nadal making particularly big improvements.
“He’s actually using a side-spin backhand; it’s become an unbelievable shot,” said Miguel Crespo, the I.T.F.’s development research officer.
Mats Wilander, who was ranked No.1 in 1988, was one of the first of the stars with a two-handed backhand to make effective use of the one-handed slice.
“Now it’s almost a prerequisite,” McEnroe said. “And I can tell you that we have quite a few of our players who are really good two-handed players that we work with on the slice every day.”

Assange, Back in News, Never Left U.S. Radar

In June 2011, Ogmundur Jonasson, Iceland’s minister of the interior at the time, received an urgent message from the authorities in the United States. It said that “there was an imminent attack on Icelandic government databases” by hackers, and that the F.B.I. would send agents to investigate, Mr. Jonasson said in a telephone interview.


But when “eight or nine” F.B.I. agents arrived in August, Mr. Jonasson said, he found that they were not investigating an imminent attack, but gathering material on WikiLeaks, the activist group that has been responsible for publishing millions of confidential documents over the past three years, and that has many operatives in Iceland.
Mr. Jonasson asked the agents to leave, he said, because they had misrepresented the purpose of their visit.
The operation in Iceland was part of a wide-ranging investigation into WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, for their roles in the release of American military and diplomatic documents in 2010. The investigation has been quietly gathering material since at least October 2010, six months after the arrest of Pfc. Bradley Manning, the army enlistee who is accused of providing the bulk of the leaks.
Until he re-emerged this week as an ally for Edward J. Snowden, the former computer contractor who leaked details of National Security Agency surveillance, Mr. Assange looked like a forgotten man. WikiLeaks had not had a major release of information in several years, its funds had dwindled and several senior architects of its systems left, citing internal disputes. Mr. Assange himself is holed up in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London, where he fled to avoid extradition to Sweden for questioning on allegations of sexual abuse.
But the United States government had not forgotten about him. Interviews with government agents, prosecutors and others familiar with the WikiLeaks investigation, as well as an examination of court documents, suggest that Mr. Assange and WikiLeaks are being investigated by several government agencies, along with a grand jury that has subpoenaed witnesses.
Tens of thousands of pages of evidence have been gathered. And at least four other former members of WikiLeaks have had contact with the United States authorities seeking information on Mr. Assange, the former members said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a matter they were informed was confidential.
In response to recent questions from The New York Times and others, a Justice Department spokesman confirmed that it “has an investigation into matters involving WikiLeaks, and that investigation remains ongoing,” but he declined to offer any details.
The prosecution of WikiLeaks would put the administration into tricky legal territory. WikiLeaks is an international organization, and, unlike Private Manning and Mr. Snowden, Mr. Assange and the other members did not work for the United States government or its contractors and could not be charged with espionage.
WikiLeaks maintains it was functioning as a publisher by enabling the release of information in the public interest, and it has frequently been a partner with traditional news organizations, including The New York Times and The Guardian. If the government charged WikiLeaks and Mr. Assange as co-conspirators, it would be arguing that, unlike their partners, they are not journalists.
“Given the government’s aggression in the Snowden case, I would expect that the government will continue to move forward with the Assange case on a conspiracy theory, even though WikiLeaks would seem eligible for First Amendment protections,” said James C. Goodale, a First Amendment lawyer who previously worked for The Times and is the author of “Fighting for the Press.”
He added that no reporter had ever been successfully prosecuted on a conspiracy charge but that recent actions, like the investigation of a Fox News reporter, James Rosen, was evidence that the  government was “moving toward criminalizing the reporting process.”
The Times has never been contacted as part of a WikiLeaks investigation, said David E. McCraw, its assistant general counsel. “But I would note that the proposed shield law,” he said, describing new legislation that the administration says is an effort to shield journalists from prosecution, “tries to define Wiki-like publishers out of the definition of news organizations.”
Mr. Assange declined to be interviewed, but said in a statement to The Times that the Justice Department “and its accompanying F.B.I. investigation are blinded by their zeal to get rid of publishers who speak truth to power.
“They believe U.S. agencies can flout laws, coerce people into becoming informants, steal our property and detain our alleged sources without trial,” the statement added.
The investigation has largely been carried out in secret, as most are, but a few clues have emerged. In December 2010, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Virginiarequested Twitter account information for Private Manning, Mr. Assange and Birgitta Jonsdottir, a former WikiLeaks activist and now a member of Iceland’s Parliament, among others.
A redacted version of the subpoena served on Ms. Jonsdottir cited a specific conspiracy provision that may have been aimed at those thought to have assisted Private Manning
.

"With Neymar on board, I would have planned to sell Messi"

Johan Cruyff, who still sees Messi and Neymar together as being risky, answers MARCA's questions.
What will Neymar bring to the party?
We'll have to wait and see. He is talented but we'll have to see how he gets on with everyone. That's a problem.
Everyone says he won't get on with Messi. You yourself have said the same.
That's what started all this about me being against Rosell. It's absurd: if I have an opinion, I express it. If I think he's made a mistake, I don't say it as the enemy; I say it because that's what I think.
Could the fact that Neymar's father has walked away with €40 million create jealousy in the dressing room?
It could. It's like the free kicks. Neymar is very good at taking them. And Messi has already shown he is. Who's going to take them? Or the fact that Neymar and Barcelona are with Nike while Leo is with Adidas. These are situations that could cause problems.
Neymar should have been brought in and Messi sold to avoid conflicts? Do you agree with that?
With Neymar on board, I would have planned for the possibility of selling Messi, and some would agree with that, others not. You are talking about a team, its players, the things around it... There are too may things at stake. That's why it's so difficult to manage such a top class squad.
It's true that, if the pairing works, its will be formidable...
Undoubtedly. We'll have to wait and see - it could turn out well or badly. It's a risk.
Would you have taken the risk?
No, I wouldn't have signed Neymar.

Kaká will only go if Real lets him leave for free

It looks increasingly likely that Kaká will leave Real Madrid this summer as the club now considers that keeping him just isn't feasible. In past years, Madrid always had a straw to clutch at or a faint hope that the attacking midfielder would rediscover his form. However, this year it appears that Kaká has permanently lost his place in Ancelotti's new project at the Bernabeu.
In any case, the Italian will have the final word whether Kaká stays or not. If he - who already coached the midfielder at AC Milan and could become his saviour at Madrid - tells him that he is surplus to requirements, the 2007 Ballon d'Or winner will pack his bags and move on. The Brazilian faces increased competition for his place, even more so with Isco's arrival at the club.
Isco's move to the Bernabeu, Jesé's promotion to the first team and Gareth Bale's possible arrival would see the Brazilian midfielder pushed even further down the pecking order at Madrid.
That said, Kaká will only leave if Carlo Ancelotti sits down with him and tells him that he does not figure in his plans, and if the club lets him leave for nothing. He was close to leaving last summer, but Madrid blocked any potential deal by demanding a prohibitive transfer fee of over €20m. This time around, Kaká will ask to leave for free.

Luis Suárez - open to offers

Luis Suárez will start to look at other offers in the event of a move away from Liverpool. As reported by MARCA, the Uruguayan forward reached an agreement with Real Madrid several weeks ago so that, pending the go ahead from the English club, the way would be clear for a fast track transfer to 'Los Blancos'.
That was a month ago now. Time has gone on and Real Madrid still has no official coach, a factor holding up any deals it may be able, or may want to do, among them that of Luis Suárez.
MARCA has discovered that Suárez has other offers comparable to that of Real Madrid on the table which he has now started to consider in view of Real Madrid's indecision.
The agreement with Real Madrid does not signify a done deal for several reasons: firstly, it is dependent on the new coach coming in, and secondly, in the event that the coach is happy with the signing, negotiations would still have to take place regarding the €47 million buy-out clause in place for Suárez at his English club.
In the meantime, Luis is open to any offers coming in as those responsible for handling the player's affairs feel that he has waited long enough.
Suárez is currently playing in the Confederations Cup, where he has racked up three goals, making him the top scorer in the history of Uruguayan football.

Buffon: "There will be no repeat of the Euro2012 final"

Gianluigi Buffon (b. Carrara, 1978) will again cross paths with Spainin a major international competition. The 'Azzurri' captain has no problem labelling 'La Roja' as "the best national team in the world", but he warns that here in Brazil, there will be no repeat of the type of game played between them at Euro2012. "We're going to be hard to beat," he warns.
Question: Playing Spain again…?
Answer: Yes. We've played each other in the past two European Championships and we're playing again… Spain is always a tough opponent, but we aren't scared.
Q: Do you know how you're going to approach the match?
A: We haven't spoken about it yet, but we have a clear-cut plan. Right now, Spain is the strongest team in the world and we have to contain its midfield. We have to play a very serious game, remain focussed and try not to let their players get comfortable on the ball. I think that we're going to play a great game.
Q: What type of game are you expecting?
A: I'm sure that it's going to be a very evenly-matched game. I don't expect it to be, but I hope it isn't like the last time we met. There will be no repeat of our game at Euro2012 and we're going to give our all to reach the final. We know that Spain is currently the stronger team, but Italy is a good team too and we're going to put up a fight. Everyone can be sure that Spain is going to have to work very hard to beat us.